Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microbiol Resour Announc ; 12(12): e0091523, 2023 Dec 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38014973

RESUMO

Mycobacteriophage Phayeta was extracted from soil near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina using Mycobacterium smegmatis as a host. Annotation of the 68,700 base-pair circularly permuted genome identified 104 predicted protein-encoding genes, 34 of which have functional assignments.

2.
J Pharm Pract ; 36(4): 925-932, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35459405

RESUMO

During hospitalization, the risk of hypotension and associated sequelae remain important considerations for patient outcomes. The use of push-dose vasopressors (PDP) outside of the operating room has increased in recent years to combat the negative effects of hypotension. This narrative review evaluates the utility of PDP in its traditional perioperative setting as well as in areas of increasing use such as the emergency department and intensive care unit. Articles evaluating PDP highlight successful increases in blood pressure with all agents but differ in rates of adverse events and most lack direct comparison of PDP agents in regard to safety and efficacy. Agents utilized as PDP, including epinephrine, phenylephrine, norepinephrine, vasopressin, and ephedrine vary in mechanism of action, onset of action, and duration of action. These variations in pharmacology along with published literature may lead to differences in the preferred PDP for various clinical scenarios. Many adverse events associated with PDP have been due to dosing errors highlighting the importance of education surrounding the use of these agents. Additional research is necessary to further elucidate the risks and benefits of PDP in clinical practice, and to determine which PDP is truly preferred. Careful consideration should be given when determining the appropriateness of this administration method of vasopressors in various clinical scenarios.


Assuntos
Hipotensão , Vasoconstritores , Humanos , Vasoconstritores/efeitos adversos , Fenilefrina/efeitos adversos , Epinefrina , Hipotensão/induzido quimicamente , Hipotensão/tratamento farmacológico , Cuidados Críticos
3.
Hosp Pharm ; 55(6): 400-404, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33245723

RESUMO

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if dosing fentanyl, dexmedetomidine, and propofol based on ideal or adjusted vs actual weight in patients would decrease overall opioid and sedative use. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review comparing adjusted vs actual weight-based dosing protocol of mechanically ventilated (MV) intensive care unit (ICU) adult patients who required fentanyl and either propofol or dexmedetomidine. Results: A total of 261 patients were included in which 101 patients were in the actual weight group and 160 patients were in the adjusted weight group. Total doses per MV day of fentanyl was 1042 ± 1060 µg in the actual weight group vs 901 ± 1025 µg in the adjusted weight group (P = .13). Total doses per MV day of midazolam was 20 ± 19 mg in the actual group vs 15 ± 19 mg adjusted group (P = .02). Average MV days was 8.2 vs 7.1 days, ICU length of stay was 10.6 vs 9.4 days, and self-extubation rates were 17.8% vs 4.4% in the actual group and adjusted group, respectively. Conclusion: Total midazolam doses per MV day were lower in the adjusted group. No significant change was seen in MV days, ICU length of stay, or self-extubation rates.

4.
BMJ Open ; 9(11): e031242, 2019 11 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31767589

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review is to identify and synthesise studies evaluating performance-based functional outcome measures designed to evaluate the functional abilities of patients with neck pain. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, COCHRANE, Google Scholar and a citation mapping strategy was conducted until July 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: More than half of the study's patient population had neck pain or a musculoskeletal neck disorder and completed a functional-based test. Clinimetric properties of at least one performance-based functional tests were reported. Both traumatic and non-traumatic origins of neck pain were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant data were then extracted from selected articles using an extraction guide. Selected articles were appraised using the Quality Appraisal for Clinical Measurement Research Reports Evaluation Form (QACMRR). RESULTS: The search obtained 12 articles which reported on four outcome measures (functional capacity evaluations (FCE), Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator II (BTEWS II), Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA)) and a physiotherapy test package, to assess the functional abilities in patients with mechanical neck pain. Of the selected papers: one reports content validity, five construct validity, four reliability, one sensitivity to change and one both reliability and construct validity. QACMRR scores ranged from 68% to 95%. CONCLUSIONS: This review found very good quality evidence that the FIT-HaNSA has excellent inter and intra-rater reliability and very weak to weak convergent validity. Excellent quality evidence of fair test-retest reliability, weak convergent validity and very weak known groups validity for the BTEWS II test was found. Good to excellent quality evidence exists that an FCE battery has poor to excellent reliability and very weak to strong validity. Good to excellent quality of weak to strong validity and trivial to strong effect sizes were found for a physiotherapy test package. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018112358.


Assuntos
Cervicalgia/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos em Chicotada/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Desempenho Físico Funcional , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
5.
J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med ; 21(2): 92-104, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350243

RESUMO

We assessed the attitudes of Canadian obstetricians toward chiropractic with a 38-item cross-sectional survey. Ninety-one obstetricians completed the survey, for a response rate of 14% (91 of 659). Overall, 30% of respondents held positive views toward chiropractic, 37% were neutral, and 33% reported negative views. Most (77%) reported that chiropractic care was effective for some musculoskeletal complaints, but 74% disagreed that chiropractic had a role in treatment of non-musculoskeletal conditions. Forty percent of respondents referred at least some patients for chiropractic care each year, and 56% were interested in learning more about chiropractic care. Written comments from respondents revealed concerns regarding safety of spinal manipulation and variability among chiropractors. Canadian obstetricians' attitudes toward chiropractic are diverse and referrals to chiropractic care for their patients who suffer from pregnancy-related low back pain are limited. Improved interprofessional relations may help optimize care of pregnant patients suffering from low back pain.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Manipulação Quiroprática/estatística & dados numéricos , Obstetrícia , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadá , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar/terapia , Masculino , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...